DEPRAVITY and FREEWILL |
|
|
|
DEPRAVITY Depravity refers to the sinful condition of the human race that originated when Adam and Ishah (the woman) disobeyed God in the garden of Eden. It refers primarily to the corruption of man’s nature through a mental mutation that produces an ever present influence toward independence from God (sin nature), and then, from that INFLUENCE or inclination, to the morally and spiritually sinful expressions that dominate and characterize man’s existence (personal sin). NATURAL DEPRAVITY Inherent sin refers to the sin nature which was (came into existence) in Adam and passed on to his progeny, “in his image” (Genesis 5:3), through procreation. Thus, it is through a physical inheritance. At Psalm 51:5 both aspects of physical birth are covered. 1. In iniquity (awon) I was brought forth (birthed). This refers to the presence of the sin nature in the newborn child. 2. In sin (ch@te) I was conceived. This refers to the physical transfer of the sin nature through the combination of both male and female seeds. The use of two different words for “sin” (awon and ch@te), is an example of synonymous parallelism, a device of Hebrew poetry that uses two different words to refer to the same idea. The sin nature is a disposition to independence from God. In experience, it expresses itself as an “ungodly” influence or mover in our life. Genesis 8:21 (NASB) “for the intent of man’s heart is evil from his youth.” The word, intent, is the Hebrew word, y@tser, which describes an influence or inclination. Thus it refers to the natural and dominant force upon man’s mentality. The word, evil, is ra, which always refers to some idea of HARM. It has thus, become the standard Hebrew word for evil. However, whereas all ra is harm, not all harm is evil. But in this context, it refers to that which is harmful to self and others according to God’s moral and spiritual standards. The idea of “from his youth,” indicates that the influence is present from the earliest days of the person’s life. The phrase can be compared to Genesis 6:5, “every inclination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil all the days,” where “all the days” would indicate not only the idea of “continually (NASB),” but the idea of all throughout his life beginning with birth. This verse also details the inclination by saying, “the inclination of the THOUGHTS of his heart.” In other words, the influence of the sin nature affects the mentality and manifests itself in the thoughts. From Proverbs 22:15a, we learn that FOOLISHNESS (creature independence and arrogance) is present in the heart of children, and from Psalm 58:3, that the wicked are ESTRANGED (independent from God) from the moment of birth (from the womb). Jeremiah 17:9 tells us that the heart (influenced by this evil INCLINATION; dominated by the sin nature) is deceitful and seriously sick (out of alignment with God). At Mark 7:21-23, we see that from the HEART (influenced by this evil INCLINATION; dominated by the sin nature) come all the harmful attitudes and actions that are contrary to the righteous standards of God’s divine value system. At Romans 7:14-23, Paul tells us that the hurtful things he does come from THE SIN (nature) that exists in his physical BODY, and that it is continually waging war against the righteous standards (law) that exist in his MIND. By comparing all these factors, we learn that although the HEART is the means by which evil is EXPRESSED, the INFLUENCE comes from the PHYSICAL mutated mentality genes in THE FLESH, where the sin nature resides. At Ecclesiastes 9.3, Solomon makes a valid observation, “Furthermore, the hearts of the sons of men are full of evil, and insanity is in their hearts throughout their lives,” (NASB). The word, insanity refes to the distortion/mutation of the soul that produces an evil INCLINATION. The Hebrew word is hol@lAh in the plural and occurs only 4 times (Ec. 1:17; 2:12; 7:25; 9:3). It comes from the verb, hAlal, which means to be boastful (root meaning). In the piel stem it means to praise, honor, and to recognize the merit in something. The plural indicates many expressions of boasting, pride, arrogance and independence from God. This attitude refers to self-promotion and is a distortion from the original design of the soul. Thus, the idea of insanity and madness. The guiltiness associated with this sin nature is mentioned at Ephesians 2:3, “Among them we too, all formerly lived in the lusts of our flesh (sin nature), indulging the desires of the flesh (body) and of the mind (soul), and were by NATURE children of wrath (under the condemnation of God’s justice), even as the rest.” The word, nature, is phusis, and indicates something that is a NATURAL part and expression of one’s humanity. At Romans 5:12ff, Paul writes “just as through one man, THE sin (nature) entered into the world (human race), and THE (spiritual) death through THE sin (nature), and so THE (spiritual) death spread to all men because of which (sin nature) all have sinned (manifested sinful thoughts and actions). The mention of sin here, refers to the presence of the sin nature and not to any idea of an imputation of Adam’s specific sin to his progeny. See Theory of imputed sin for details on this passage. Paul is telling us that spiritual death exists upon all members of the human race because they have within themselves THE sin nature; the INCLINATION to do evil that God identified in mankind at Genesis 6:5 and 8:21. WHAT IS SPIRITUAL DEATH The term spiritual death does not occur in the Bible, but is a man-made vocabulary term to communicate what the Bible teaches about the condition of mankind as a result of sin. However, it gives the wrong impression that the human spirit of man is dead, but this is not the case. When Adam sinned, he did not lose any part of his human makeup. His Body, soul and spirit were still there and functioning (Genesis 7:22; Job 34:14; Isaiah 42:5; 57:16). The statement of judgment on Adam's sin follows the pattern of Genesis 2:17, which says, “You shall surely die.” The Hebrew here is, muth as a qal participle + a qal imperfect, and is an intensified, emphatic construction which refers to the spiritual death that resulted from the act of independence from God. When Adam and Ishah disobeyed God by eating from the tree, they lost both relationship and fellowship with God. They became separated from Him and from His blessing. Thus, they lost their ability to interact with God on a SPIRITUAL level, and that is the basis for the term spiritual death. Spiritual death is the inability to relate to God, self or others from the perspective of Divine viewpoint. The capacity to understand these three areas using God's logic is neutralized. This causes a natural alienation to God, others and even to self. This alienation is called nakedness at Genesis 3:7-10, and refers both the physical nakedness that now shamed them, as well as the nakedness of soul that caused them to fear God. 4. When Adam sinned against God by disobeying His instructions, he died. Gen. 2:17 says, “in the DAY that you eat from it you shall surely die.” But he did not die physically (Genesis 3:7). He died in the realm of his relationship with God. In fact, he lost that relationship, that communion, that fellowship as is evidenced by his indifference to God immediately after the sin (Genesis 3:7), and his fear of God later, when God came into the garden (Genesis 3:8-10). He was now afraid of God and hid from God, and it is this loss of relationship with God that is the death that he died. The “principle” is seen at Isaiah 59:2, “But your iniquities have made a separation between you and your God, And your sins have hidden His face from you so that He doesn’t hear.” The basis for this death of Adam was his disobedience to God. An act of negative volition that constituted an attempt at independence from God. The act of negative volition caused a distortion of both the soul and the body which distortion became a major part of man’s makeup. This distortion came about because when Adam sinned his “nature” changed. It became “evil.” It is a nature or “influence” within that consistently operates contrary (negative) to divine viewpoint. This possession of a “sin nature” puts man in a place of perpetual resistance to God. Gen. 6:5; 8:21 Spiritual death entered into the realm of the human race through Eve's and Adam's original act of sin. This is what caused their personal separation from God. Other things resulted but these are not the cause of spiritual death, but rather indicate the fact of that original sin and the spiritual death that resulted. (Sin nature; physical death; curse on the earth; Satan's rule). Spiritual death then is passed down to all members of the human race because Adam's children all inherit from him the sin nature. It is the presence of the sin nature that causes spiritual death in each individual. The commission of personal sins further demonstrates the reality of spiritual death and man's separation from relationship and fellowship with God. Thus, the indictment found in the bible is that man is DEAD in trespasses and sins (Ephesians 2:1) and DEAD in transgressions (personal sins) and the uncircumcision of your flesh (sin nature), Colossians 2:13. This expression of personal sin is called functional depravity. Unless there is a "faith in Christ" decision, this spiritual death will be perpetuated for all eternity as the second death in the lake of fire (Revelation 20:11-15). FUNCTIONAL DEPRAVITY Functional depravity refers to personal sin; all the rebellious thoughts and actions which violate God’s perfect standards. These are manifested in the lives of people PRIMARILY because of the influence of the sin nature, however it needs to be kept in mind that Adam and Ishah sinned against God WITHOUT that influence. The expressions of sin, therefore, come directly and specifically from the volition of man’s soul. The influence may come from the outside, as in Adam’s case, or from the inside, as in the case of all of Adam’s progeny, but ultimately it is the volitional capacity of the self-consciousness of the soul of man that CHOOSES what will be thought and attempted. The Bible indicates that these expressions of sin are the EVIDENCE of the fact that all men are (spiritually) DEAD to God (Ephesians 2:1). “And you were dead in trespasses and sins” (plural). These trespasses and sins are usually summarized best by Romans 3:10-18. The premise is that the manifestation of sins is present in the life of every member of the human race. Sins are violations of God’s established standards for both relating to other people (morality) and to Himself (worship). Solomon acknowledged to God, “for there is no man who does not sin, (1 Kings 8:46). The essence of these sinful expressions are found in the description of the sin nature, which is revealed to us in several passages. Genesis 8:21 1. inclination: the noun, yātser, refers to an influence or natural “bent” or impulse affecting the mentality (heart). 2. evil: ra refers to that which is functionally harmful, and as such, expresses ideas contrary to the viewpoint and policy of God. Ecclesiastes 9:3 insanity - the distortion/mutation of the soul 1. The word is holālAh. It occurs in the plural only and only four times, all in Ecclessiastes. (Verses 1:17; 2:12; 7:25; 9:3) 2. It comes from the verb, hAlal, which means to be boastful in its root meaning. In the piel stem, it means to praise, honor, or to recognize the merit in something. 3. The plural indicates expressions of boasting, pride, arrogance and independence from God. a. This is self-promotion and a distortion from the original design of the soul. b. Thus, the idea of insanity and madness; a sickness of the mentality that is seen in the next passage. Jeremiah 17:9 1. deceitful above all else: The word, Aqōbh, speaks of error and falsehood; imitation and counterfeit. 2. desperately sick: The adjective, Anash, speaks of distortion and abnormality; a sickness of the mind that is natural and common to all members of the human race. With this understanding, we should expect a preponderance of sinful activity from all the peoples of the world. Paul gives us a list of such sinful activity that CHARACTERIZES the human race in general, at Romans 3:10-18. This list does not suggest that everyone does every sin that is listed, but that in general, all men are characterized by one or more of these sinful expressions. The prevalence of personal sin in the human race indicates that INCLINATION of the sin nature is very difficult to resist, but it in no way suggests that it is impossible to resist. That inclination is, in fact, resisted in areas of DIVINE morality as well as in God’s saving call. The passage at Romans 3:10ff is a compilation of several quotes from the Old Testament that describe certain individuals and never have the entirety of the human race in view. Each of the specific contexts should be examined carefully to determine this. The passage thus serves as an illustration of how bad man is in general and is not intended to indicate an INABILITY for man to truly seek for God and respond to Him when they find Him (Acts 17:27). “that they should seek God, if perhaps they might grope for Him and find Him, though He is not far from each one of us.” Isaiah 55:6, “Seek Yahweh while He may be found; Call upon Him while He is near.” The depravity of the human race is uniquely categorized and summarized for us by Paul at Romans 5:6-10, where we find four words that give us the acrostic H.U.S.E. Verse 6 (1) For while we were still HELPLESS. Helpless is mentioned first, but should actually be understood last. It refers to the inability of man to do anything about his depravity, in and of himself. Paul states the helplessness of man and then explains the three factors of depravity which man can do nothing to resolve. The solution comes entirely from God’s love and grace. Man cannot earn the solution. He cannot work for it. He cannot inherit it. He cannot willfully determine it for himself. He cannot buy it. He cannot be born with it. He cannot accomplish it for another nor can another sinner accomplish it for him. God must reach out to man in His love and grace and not only PROVIDE the solution (the Savior), but also OFFER the solution to all men, and then convict them of the issues so that they are then ABLE to choose whether to accept it or not. Even though the sin nature is a powerful and even DOMINANT influence in everyone’s life, there is still the ability in man’s soul - his self-consciousness, where there exists the capacity of volition - to resist it. Just as God tells Cain, when his problem is identified as the influence of the sin nature. “but you must master it.” The focus with, “but you,” establishes the presence and function of human volition (or free will) and makes Cain responsible for his own decisions. He could GIVE INTO the sin nature influence, as he has already done in reference to this specific issue - or he can resist it and accept the Messianic promise, and begin to follow God’s righteous standards. The fact that Cain is an unbeliever, and “of the evil one” (1 John 3:12), does not mean he CANNOT choose for God, for God requests this kind of choice from him - and indeed, from all members of the human race. Jesus put it into perspective when he gave the invitation at John 5:24, “Truly, truly, I say to you, he who hears My word, and believes Him who sent Me, has eternal life,” and then explained at verse 40, “and you are NOT WILLING to come to me so that you may have life.” This was Cain’s problem. Yes, the influence from the sin nature was strong, but he was not forced into yielding to it, just as God told him, “but you must master it.” The words must master, are from mAshal, as a qal imperfect, which means to rule over or to master. Usually this imperfect tense would be rendered, “but you SHALL rule over it,” but the context requires the idea of MUST or SHOULD. Obviously, they cannot both be MASTER of the soul, so in order to prevent the influence of the sin nature from dictating EVERY thought and action in one’s life, the self-consciousness is called upon and able to resist - sometimes, simply from the standpoint of SELF-PRESERVATION. In fact, God’s standards (as revealed by God’s prophets and from there by societies that have been influenced by God’s word) are directed to the free will of man to make such decisions concerning both morality issues and the issue of the gospel. When we learn about or experience something that is adverse to our personal well-being, quite often we will make adjustments to protect ourselves. There are also moral standards that a society and individuals within that society hold to. This does not make a person RIGHT with God, but it indicates the function of volition in doing what is deemed as right and proper in a moral context. So also the message of the gospel appeals to the self-preservation mode of our self-consciousness and offers a way of escape from the penalty of sin and the wrath of God. Such an appeal to man’s soul PRESUPPOSES an ability to choose the way of escape, and that is what Yahweh is doing with Cain. The mastering of the sin nature, or the RULING OVER of the sin nature refers, then, to the CONSCIOUS resistance of its influence so that a RIGHT and PROPER decision is made, whether it be right moral choices, or the choice to trust in the Messiah. Such a decision in either area, does not remove the presence of the sin nature or its constant influence on the soul, but it simply resists a particular inclination at that moment of time. (2) at the right time Christ died for the UNGODLY. Ungodly: Literally means, un-worshipping (asebes). The word comes from the verb, sebo, which means to bend the knee in respect, adoration or worship. The “a” is a negative, and indicates an attitude and/or action that does not respectful, adoring or worshipful. It refers, then, to the general nature of man as an un-worshipping creature, with a natural inclination (sin nature) to act independently from God. (3) But . . . while we were yet SINNERS. Sinners, refers to functional depravity; the many thoughts and acts of sin committed throughout his life. This refers to the “trespasses and sins” of Ephesians 2:1, and the list of sinful expressions found at Romans 3:10-23. (4) For if while we were ENEMIES. Enemies indicates that because man is "naturally" depraved (ungodly) and because he is "functionally" depraved (personal sins), he is an enemy of God; no affinity, no compatibility, no rapport and no fellowship. Only God can solve these four problems, and that solution is described at 1 Corinthians 1:30, and is represented by the letters, W.R.S.R. (wisdom, righteousness, sanctification, redemption) But by HIS (The Father's) doing you are IN Christ Jesus, Who (Christ) became to us: A. Wisdom from God: Wisdom refers to the divine solution to our sin problem and offsets the "Helpless" factor of Romans 5. B. And righteousness: this refers to the imputation of God's righteousness to the believer, which is called justification. God now sees us as perfectly righteous in his eyes, from a positional or relationship perspective. This offsets the "ungodly" factor at Romans 5. Even though we are still sinful by nature while alive here on earth (the sin nature is a physical mutation of the mentality genes and will be present as long as we are in these mortal bodies), yet in our position IN CHRIST, God sees us as righteous. C. And sanctification: This refers to POSITIONAL sanctification; the fact that we are positionally united with Christ in His death and resurrection so that we are right now "seated together" in the heavenlies IN Christ (Ephesians 2:6). The idea of sanctification refers to being set apart from others in a unique and privileged status. That is what happens when God the Holy Spirit takes every person at the very moment of faith in Christ and IDENTIFIES (baptizes) him into the body of Christ (1 Cor. 12:13). 1 Corinthians 1:2, “sanctified in Christ Jesus.” Because of this union with Christ and the possession of God's perfect righteousness, we are reconciled to Him and are no longer enemies. This offsets the "enemy" factor of Romans 5. D. And Redemption: This refers to the payment for and release from the penalty for sins. Ephesians 1:7, IN whom we have redemption through his blood, the forgiveness (release) from our sins. This offsets the "Sinner" factor of Romans 5. There are some who teach that man is totally UNABLE to come to Christ because the extent of depravity reaches to the very core of their will, so that their will is actually STUCK in rebellion against God so that they won’t even seek for God. The passages used for this are Romans 3:11-12, 1 Corinthians 2:14 and John 6:44 and Romans 8:7. These are simply misunderstood because the Scripture teaches as a whole, that not only is man ABLE to search for God, but is also able to CHOOSE to accept God’s offer of grace. They also teach that since man is DEAD, he is unable to do anything that can only be done by the living. They love to use Lazarus who was dead, and unable to bring himself out from the tomb, but needed the divine assistance of Jesus in order to live. So also, it is claimed, those who are spiritually dead, must be made alive by the divine regeneration of God before they can do anything of a spiritual nature, and that includes expressing faith in the gospel. The problem with this is, that there is no scriptural teaching of this or basis for comparing the condition of spiritual death with physical death. It is obvious that in physical death, there is no physical FUNCTION, however, in spiritual death, the soul continues to function with full ability to comprehend divine morality, the existence of God, and the plan of salvation. Practically every page of Scripture screams that man is both ABLE to respond to God and indeed, called upon by God to respond. It is therefore necessary in this dissertation on depravity to recognize and establish that the soul of all men has a functional free will, certainly influenced toward evil, but in no way, incapacitated in its search for God. We have seen the presence and influence of the sin nature upon the “heart” (mentality) of man. But does the Scripture teach that this evil influence actually PREVENTS any kind of positive response to God? The answer is a resounding NO! I am only going to discuss examples of unbelievers with volitional capacity, since these are the ones who are under the fullness of sinful depravity. The first occasion for us to observe the function of man’s free will in general, is with the UNBELIEVER, Cain. This has already been discussed and I refer the reader back to that discussion via Genesis 4:7, “If you do right, will there not be an acceptance? And if you do not do right, sin (principle and influence of the sin nature) is residing at the door, and its desire is for you, but you must master it.” The next occasion for this observation is at Genesis 4:26, where we have a somewhat NEUTRAL focus. Here, without any reference to CAUSE, we find that statement that “men began calling upon the name of the LORD.” This should remind us of the general invitation extended to all from God through Joel 2:32 and Romans 10:13 that, “whoever calls upon the name of the LORD, will be saved.” The next occasion concerns Abram as an unbeliever. In the Old Testament we do not have any record of his salvation decision nor of when God FIRST contacted him. But we learn from Acts 7:2-3, that God had appeared to him while he was still in Ur of the Chaldees. Thus, the appearance and INVITATION to “go forth,” that is recorded at Genesis 12:1, is a SECOND one. The initial act of obedience to God was then made while Abe was still in Ur, and would indicate that it is at that time or before, that Abe trusted in Yahweh and the messianic promise for salvation. There is no hint that God CAUSED Abe to believe or obey, but that Abe had entered into a relationship with God based on the pattern mentioned at Genesis 4:26; the pattern of faith being expressed first BEFORE any spiritual benefits. The next occasion is when we encounter an unbeliever Pharoah of Egypt at Genesis 12:14-20. This man wanted Abe’s “sister” for his wife and had her brought into his house. When God began to judge him, he learned that Sarah was actually Abe’s wife, and in response, he did the MORALLY RIGHTEOUS thing. He took her back to Abe, and sent them on their way without any IMMORAL actions. He certainly was “free” and “able” to make right and proper decisions when given the right facts. These truths can be denied, but cannot be disproved. | ||
©Ron Wallace, http://www.biblefragrances.com.
Anyone is free to reproduce this material and distribute it, |
||||